In accordance with Article 13, paragraph 1, point b) of the EU Withdrawal Act, “reasonable coordination” is necessary to simultaneously approve the withdrawal agreement and the framework for future relations between the UK and the EU, in the form of a political declaration. On 18 June, Lord Hailsham`s amendment was accepted by the Lords, a defeat for the government by 354 votes to 235: a majority of 119   On the morning of the vote, 12 June 2018, the government rejected Grieve`s alternative amendment. This paved the way for differences of opinion in the debate in the House of Commons on whether Parliament should have a say if the UK left the EU without a deal.   In the morning, Phillip Lee`s surprise resignation as a young Conservative minister said: “If I have to look my children in the eye and honestly say that I did my best for them, I cannot, in good conscience, support the way our country will withdraw from the EU.”  The Speaker of the House of Commons, Ms Leadsom, told MEPs that the European Council would only approve the extension on 22 May if MEPs approved the withdrawal agreement on Friday at 23:00 GMT. Mrs May said a new “useful vote” would take place “as soon as possible” but that she would make a statement if it did not take place by February 13, and that it would be followed by a debate on a changeable proposal on 14 February.  If the withdrawal agreement had been implemented in accordance with standard procedure, Parliament could therefore theoretically have been disinted until it had to consider the bill necessary for its implementation. This legislation will not be put in place until after the contracts have been signed. And the passage of this legislation would have produced the only parliamentary vote in the whole process. Parliamentary votes on Brexit, sometimes referred to as “sensible votes,” are the parliamentary votes of Section 13 of the United Kingdom`s European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, which requires the UK government to submit a amended parliamentary motion to ratify the Brexit withdrawal agreement at the end of negotiations between the government and the European Union, in accordance with Article 50.   The important vote took place on January 15, 2019 in the House of Commons.  The vote was originally scheduled to take place on December 11, 2018, but on December 10, May postponed it because it became clear that the government`s Brexit deal would be rejected.   On December 4, 2018, the government tabled a business motion to establish the timetable for the meaningful vote, as requested in S13 (1) (b), with the vote scheduled for December 11, 2018.  On October 21, the government issued the withdrawal agreement and proposed three days of debate for opposition members to review it.
 The government introduced the recently revised EU Withdrawal Act in the House of Commons for debate on the evening of 22 October 2019.  MEPs voted in favour of a second reading, adopted by 329 votes to 299, and the timetable for debate on the law, which was rejected by 322 votes to 308. Prior to the vote, Johnson had said that he would abandon attempts to pass the agreement and would seek to hold parliamentary elections if his timetable did not generate the necessary support for its adoption by Parliament. After the vote, Mr Johnson announced that the law would be overturned while he held talks with other EU leaders.   Even if the House of Commons approved the withdrawal agreement in the “wise vote” and therefore the agreement did not enter into these cases of treaty failure, the vote would still be part of an extremely unusual process with regard to Parliament`s role in drafting treaties in the United Kingdom. The Board of Procedure is currently conducting an investigation into the “smart vote” and will likely make recommendations on the order of the questions and the circumstances under which the government`s request may be changed.